Understanding the Limitations of VLANs: Revolutionizing Cyber Defense with Microsegmentation 

In our previous blog First Generation Network Segmentation vs Software-Defined Microsegmentation, we highlighted the issues with traditional network segmentation methods, which many enterprises still trust for their presumed security adequacy. However, VLAN ACLs, while a good first step towards segmentation, have now reached their shelf life. These methods lack the flexibility and granularity needed to manage today’s dynamic IT environments, including cloud integration, IoT adoption, and agile deployments. Moreover, VLAN-based segmentation fails to effectively combat advanced threats such as lateral movement and targeted attacks on applications. Urgent adoption of software-defined microsegmentation is necessary to overcome these limitations. 

Let’s delve deeper into these constraints, particularly focusing on VLANs, and explore why software-defined microsegmentation, like ColorTokens Xshield™ offers a solution that surpasses these shortcomings. 

While VLAN ACLs provided basic segmentation, they come with limitations that hinder their effectiveness in securing modern networks, as discussed below: 

  • Scalability Issues: VLAN segmentation using ACL, while offering a basic level of network security, introduces complexities due to the limitations of Content Addressable Memory (CAM) and Ternary Content Addressable Memory (TCAM) employed in network switches. 

    As the number of VLANs and devices on a network grows, the CAM table size on a switch becomes overwhelmed. This limitation restricts the number of unique MAC addresses a switch can learn and efficiently forward traffic for, potentially leading to performance degradation and dropped packets. While TCAM offers faster lookup capabilities compared to CAM, it’s often more expensive and limited in table size, further restricting the scalability of VLAN segmentation in large networks. 

    Both CAM and TCAM tables require manual configuration of VLAN membership and access control entries for each device. This becomes cumbersome and error-prone in large networks with frequent changes. Changes to VLAN configuration or device membership necessitate manual updates to the CAM/TCAM tables, hindering agility and responsiveness to security threats or network modifications. 

  • Security Issues: A prevalent VLAN attack is the CAM table overflow, where the switch’s Content Addressable Memory (CAM) table, responsible for port/MAC address/VLAN assignments, becomes saturated. In case of an overflow, the switch, unable to find address information, resorts to ARP broadcasts, potentially turning the switch into a hub. Attackers exploit this weakness by flooding the switch with spoofed MAC addresses, causing a CAM table overflow. As the switch replaces legitimate entries with attack packets, it starts broadcasting all incoming packets to every port, resembling a hub. This flooding creates an opportunity for attackers to extract data or engage in ARP spoofing, maintaining access even after the attack concludes. Programs like dsniff facilitate the execution of such attacks. 
  • Complicated Setup and Administration: When host services are being segmented, a significant number of ACL rules are required to be set, leading to complicated setup and administration. Furthermore, network devices are restricted in ACL capabilities and are incapable of meeting the criteria for installing large number of ACL constraints. 
  • Static, Inflexible, Error Prone: As these steps are configured on an inline device generally, network downtime is required even to modify existing VLAN groups. It is observed that over a period in an Enterprise the VLAN network grows, and it becomes extremely cumbersome to maintain the list of VLANs and the assets it belongs to which creates additional overhead to the administrator. Any IP address, subnet change needs to be manually updated and requires additional effort. Manual configuration of ACLs is prone to human error, potentially introducing security lapses or unintended consequences. 
  • Requirement of Additional Components: Implementing VLAN ACLs requires additional hardware resources, such as dedicated firewalls or switches with built-in ACL capabilities, which can increase the overall cost of the network while leading to increased complexity and potential misconfigurations.  
  • Lack of Granular Security Policy Enforcement: ACLs/VACLs operate at data/network layer and hence, lack the ability to enforce granular security policies based on context like application, user identity, or device type. This hinders the implementation of Zero Trust principles and dynamic access controls. 
  • Lack of Policy Enforcement Simulation Feature for Testing Purposes: Generally, there is no option to simulate the policy and identify the business impact, which might lead to application break and disrupt business continuity. 
  • Inability to Segment Dynamic Environments: VLANs and ACLs struggle to adapt to dynamic environments with frequent changes in user and device profiles, such as cloud workloads, containerized applications, and OT/IoT devices. 

ColorTokens Xshield™ redefines network security with a revolutionary software-defined microsegmentation solution. Deployable via lightweight agents or agentless technology, Xshield™ provides robust network traffic control and centralized policy management across diverse devices. It spans data center servers, cloud workloads, user endpoints, Kubernetes containers, OT/IoT, and legacy OS devices, ensuring comprehensive defense through both agent-based and agentless traffic policy enforcement. Unlike vulnerable VLAN-based networks, Xshield™ dynamically enforces policies based on application, user identity, and contextual attributes to mitigate risks like CAM table overflow attacks, enhancing overall security. Simplified by a unified console, Xshield™ streamlines policy management, offers real-time security insights through intuitive dashboards, and seamlessly integrates into healthcare landscapes for cloud migrations, IoT integrations, and agile application deployments. Establishing micro-perimeters around hosts simplifies policy management and aligns with modern IT environments’ dynamic needs. Built-in policy simulation features validate security measures pre-deployment, minimizing downtime and ensuring uninterrupted business operations. Designed for ephemeral environments, Xshield™ automates security updates, adapts to IP changes, and facilitates efficient policy testing, reducing human error and ensuring continuous security in evolving infrastructures. 

Xshield™ Visualizer 

In conclusion, while VLAN segmentation provides a foundational layer of security, its limitations in preventing lateral propagation and its lack of agility highlight the necessity for more robust solutions. Enterprises should prioritize implementing software-defined microsegmentation with defined micro-perimeters around every asset. This approach not only enhances protection against evolving cyber threats but also ensures greater operational flexibility. By embracing software-defined microsegmentation from the outset, organizations can effectively fortify their defenses and streamline security efforts, preparing themselves to tackle the complexities of today’s threat landscape with confidence and resilience. This proactive stance makes organizations breach-ready, safeguarding critical assets with adaptive security measures. 

Take a leap into the future with ColorTokens Xshield™ and immerse yourself in the transformative power of microsegmentation!  

For more information, please contact us.